![another word for advanced cognitive science courses another word for advanced cognitive science courses](https://s3.amazonaws.com/coursera_assets/meta_images/generated/XDP/XDP~COURSE!~dog-emotion-and-cognition/XDP~COURSE!~dog-emotion-and-cognition.jpeg)
It makes it possible to approach the understanding of literary text resonance (the unity of a communicative event, its intellectual-emotional reception and architectonics of the narrative), being the particular synergy that forms the axiosemantic field of a text, consequently realising the cognitive, pragmatic and directive functions of language.
![another word for advanced cognitive science courses another word for advanced cognitive science courses](https://media.nature.com/lw1024/magazine-assets/d41586-019-02212-4/d41586-019-02212-4_16961158.jpg)
According to its methodological postulates, linguistic analysis focuses not only on the system of language, but also on human discursive activity. While for the schools of structural linguistics it was sufficient to purport the existence of language as an abstract web of interrelations, it is insufficient for the cognitive-pragmatic linguistics. Their structural-systemic methodology excluded various extralinguistic factors from its area of interest, since from their point of view such factors were not vital sources of influence on the functional potential of language. In fact, this is the distinctive feature of the cognitive-pragmatic subparadigm of the linguistics of the 21st century as compared to structural linguistics (even to its functional variant, purported in the works of the members of the Prague Linguistic Circle). Modern linguistics aims at fusing the postulates of functional-communicative linguistics with the theory of human verbal-cognitive activity in order to extract the anthropocentric synergy of all (extralinguistic and linguistic) components of discursive text generation.